An article dated, October 10, 2016, explained the growing “biorights” movement and the issues that arise when individuals refuse to donate their biological samples for free and/or demand control over how researchers can use their samples. Much of this controversy stems from the case of Henrietta Lacks, whose cells were taken without her consent or compensation and were used for decades in research that resulted in major medical discoveries. Many individuals believe they have a right to control their biological samples even after they are donated. However, researchers are concerned that this biorights movement will hinder medical advances by reducing the availability of samples they need to conduct research that can potentially make vast impacts on public health and welfare.
From the Boston Globe, “‘Biorights’ Rise: Donors Demand Control of Their Samples”
Excerpt from article:
No longer are patients or donors like O’Connor remaining passive when it comes to providing blood, saliva, or tissue samples used for research — samples that are used to help researchers find treatments that can earn drug makers millions, or even billions, of dollars.